With all the exception of your just-mentioned OFF MG cells connected to

Материал из Медали и Ордена

Версия от 13:40, 2 апреля 2018; Quillquiver51 (Обсуждение | вклад)
(разн.) ← Предыдущая | Текущая версия (разн.) | Следующая → (разн.)
Перейти к: навигация, поиск

YT created this study, took micrographs, acquired data, interpreted final results, and wrote the Spective shamcontrols (Supplementary Figures 3A , 4A , respectively; see the respective supplementary manuscript. (1994). The `blue-on' opponent pathway in primate retina originates from a distinct bistratified ganglion cell type. Nature 367, 731?35. doi: 10.1038/367731a0 DeVries, S. H., Li, W., and Saszik, S. (2006). Parallel processing in two transmitter microenvironments at the cone photoreceptor synapse. Neuron 50, 735?48. doi: ten.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.034 Elgueta, C., Vielma, A. H., Palacios, A. G., and Schmachtenberg, O. (2015). Acetylcholine induces GABA release onto rod bipolar cells through heteromeric nicotinic receptors expressed in A17 amacrine cells. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9:6. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00006 Euler, T., and W sle, H. (1995). Immunocytochemical identification of cone bipolar cells in the rat retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 361, 461?78. Field, G. D., Gauthier, J. L., Sher, A., Greschner, M., Machado, T. A., Jepson, L. H., et al. (2010). Functional connectivity inside the retina at the resolution of photoreceptors. Nature 467, 673?77. doi: 10.1038/nature09424 Ghosh, K. K., Bujan, S., Haverkamp, S., Feigenspan, A., and W sle, H. (2004). Types of bipolar cells inside the mouse retina. J. Comp Neurol. 469, 70?2. doi: 10.1002/cne.10985 Gr ert, U., Martin, P. R., and W sle, H. (1994). Immunocytochemical evaluation of bipolar cells within the macaque monkey retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 348, 607?27. doi: 10.1002/cne.903480410 Hartveit, E. (1999). Reciprocal synaptic interactions title= 2042098614560730 between rod bipolar cells and amacrine cells within the rat retina. J. Neurophysiol. 81, 2923?936. Haverkamp, S., Haeseleer, F., and Hendrickson, A.Using the exception with the just-mentioned OFF MG cells connected to S-cones, the weakness in the S-cone connection is constant with the physiological data of Sun et al. (2006), who showed that S-cone inputs to MG-parvocellular and PG-magnocellular cells were negligible. Tailby et al. (2008) also showed that the majority of MG-parvocellular and PG-magnocellular cells received no detectable input from S-cones in the LGN. These studies could strengthen the notion that all bipolar cell kinds that connect the cones laden with neural photos towards the ganglion cell outputs may well limit visual perception by larger centers.AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONSThe authors had complete access to each of the data in the study and take complete duty for the integrity plus the accuracy in the information evaluation. YT made this study, took micrographs, acquired data, interpreted final results, and wrote the manuscript. NO took micrographs, acquired information, and checked the manuscript.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe would like to thank Toshiko Inoue and Ritsuko Fujimoto for their technical help as well as Enago for the English language assessment. This function was supported in element by a JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Analysis (22500317) to YT.Dacey, D. M., and Lee, B. B. (1994). The `blue-on' opponent pathway in primate retina originates from a distinct bistratified ganglion cell kind. Nature 367, 731?35. doi: 10.1038/367731a0 DeVries, S. H., Li, W., and Saszik, S. (2006). Parallel processing in two transmitter microenvironments at the cone photoreceptor synapse. Neuron 50, 735?48. doi: ten.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.034 Elgueta, C., Vielma, A. H., Palacios, A. G., and Schmachtenberg, O.

Личные инструменты
Пространства имён
Варианты
Действия
Символика
Сибирь
Приложения
Инструменты